Name match summary
Hill V. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Name-based search. The records, matches, and links on this page are matched by name only. They are not verified to be the same person or business named in this case, and may include relatives, namesakes, or unrelated parties. Use everything here as a research starting point for your own verification, not as established fact.
Court archive — 8 related cases
Business entity — registry lookups below
OpenCorporates · SEC EDGAR · CFPB · Secretary of State
OFAC sanctions — clear
Arrests — not applicable to business entities
FBI Most Wanted — not applicable to business entities
Case Synopsis
This is the public record summary for a civil court case 2:11-cv-01454, indexed by Open Public Records on January 29, 2016. The case is filed by Hill against Smithkline Beecham Corporation (Pennsylvania). Below you'll find enrichment from multiple authoritative business sources including OFAC sanctions, the state Secretary of State business registry, OpenCorporates, SEC EDGAR filings, CFPB consumer complaints, the Better Business Bureau, live news indexing, and 8 related cases in our 12.9-million-record archive.
Filing Details
[Objections] (12)
Internal reference ID
Deep Web Search · Smithkline Beecham Corporation 3 MATCHED
Possible news and web mentions for Smithkline Beecham Corporation (named in HILL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION). We surfaced 3 name-based results. Results are matched by name only and may refer to a different person, business, or agency — verify with the original source. Deep-search links across 11 platforms are listed below.
📰 Press Coverage · 3 matching articles
Marra v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:00:00 GMT Possible match ·
name match
legal-context
1 In this appeal we must decide whether a plaintiff may voluntarily discontinue a case where the discontinuance ultimately allows the plaintiff to avoid a previous jury trial waiver. We hold that ...…
SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA
Mon, 28 May 2007 17:00:00 GMT Possible match ·
partial name
legal-context
SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc., PICS Case No. 07-0777 (C.P. Philadelphia Dec. 1, 2006) DiVito, J. (3 pages). Plaintiffs were entitled to a permanent injunction ...…
Third Circuit Extends Actavis to Reverse Settlement Agreements Involving Non-Cash Consideration - King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp. d/b/a ...
Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:00:00 GMT Possible match ·
partial name
legal-context
Addressing for the first time whether reverse settlement agreements involving non-cash consideration merit antitrust scrutiny, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the district ...…
🌐 Search across the web
Updated weekly · 11 public search platforms linked
Compliance · Sanctions Check name-based match · not verified
CLEAR
U.S. Treasury Sanctions Check ?The U.S. Treasury keeps a list of people and companies that Americans can't legally do business with, including terrorists, drug traffickers, and sanctioned foreign officials. It's called the SDN list. We refresh our copy every day from OpenSanctions.org. It currently has 19,700 entries.
✓ Clear
We checked the U.S. Treasury's sanctions list (19,700 entries).
We checked everyone named as a party in this case, 1 name in total (Smithkline Beecham Corporation), against the list.
No match. None of the parties in this case appear on the U.S. sanctions list.
Business Entity Lookup ENTITY SEARCH name-based match · not verified
Business Records · 50-State Coverage
?Direct links to official state corporate registries and federal databases for "SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION". Click to see filings, officers, registered agent, and status on the official site.
Entity Search
Searching · Official Business Records for "SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION"
These links search official and third-party business registries for "SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION". We have not verified the entity is registered.
🏛
PA Business Entity Search
State of record · Articles, status, officers, agent
Search: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION →
🌐
OpenCorporates · Global Entity Database
200M+ companies · all 50 states + 130 jurisdictions
Search: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION →
📊
SEC EDGAR · Full-Text Filing Search
10-K, 10-Q, 8-K · public-company disclosures
Search: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION →
🛡
CFPB Consumer Complaints
Federal consumer-finance complaint database
Search: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION →
⭐
Better Business Bureau
BBB rating, reviews, complaints, accreditation
Search: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION →
📰 Recent News — SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Live press coverage · most recent 8 stories
Judge Gives Final OK To $35M GSK Flonase Settlement
Jun 19, 2013
Laurence Alden Price
Jan 11, 2025
Rachel Ferdinando Named CEO of PepsiCo Foods U.S.
Jan 21, 2025
Suit Against Tums Rejected (Published 1991)
Oct 2, 1991
Updated weekly · Articles open in publisher's site
Related Cases not surfaced for this case. Surname-matching needs a person on one side of the case with a first and last name we can identify; this case doesn't have a searchable party name on either side, so we don't show speculative matches.
How We Built This Enrichment
📡 Live data pulls
2026-05-30 11:29 EDT · Edge cache 30 days
Every section above represents a real search against an authoritative public source. Sources are refreshed on a periodic schedule and cached; results shown reflect the most recent successful refresh of each source:
OFAC (daily), OpenCorporates (real-time), SEC EDGAR (real-time), CFPB complaints (live), state Secretary of State (live), live news indexing (24-hour cache).
📊 Records searched on this page
Total volume
On this page we checked SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION against: Open Public Records archive (12.9 million court cases), and U.S. Treasury sanctions list (19,700 entries). In total, about 12.92 million records across 2 sources for this one case.
🚫 Request Removal of This Record
If this record is yours and you have legal grounds for removal (expungement, court order, statutory privacy right), submit a request below.
To process your removal, provide documentation verifying eligibility — expungement paperwork, court orders, or relevant legal documents. Approved requests are processed within 24 hours.
Note: Removal requests are human-reviewed within 24 hours. By submitting you confirm the information is accurate and you have the legal right to request removal.